当前位置:主页 > 外语论文 > 英语论文 >

高中生英语写作成绩与词汇衔接的相关性研究

发布时间:2022-12-05 06:14
  众所周知,写作作为信息输出的重要手段,常常被用来衡量学习者的英语综合能力。17年新课标对学生的写作水平提出了新的标准,使得高考中英语写作更为重要,但实际上每年高考学生写作的分数都不尽如人意。因此,写作教学便成为高中英语教学的重难点之一。写作是为了成功的交流,表达内心所思所想。作为篇章建构的重要方式之一的词汇衔接,是近年来应用语言学界和话语分析领域研究的热门话题。先前的研究对象多集中于高校大学生,缺乏对中学生的探讨。而且前人研究文体单一,大多为议论文,因此,分析高中生不同体裁作文中词汇衔接的使用情况是切实可行,意义深远的。本文采用了Halliday,Hasan和Hoey的词汇衔接理论,以巴彦淖尔市第一中学高二年级的学生为研究对象,随机抽取高二上学期期中考试的300篇书信体作文为样本,自建小型语料库来探究高中生书信体写作中词汇衔接的使用情况,研究问题如下:1.七类词汇衔接在高中生英语写作中是如何使用的?2.高分组和低分组英语作文在词汇衔接的使用上是否有差异?若有差异,具体表现如何?3.词汇衔接的运用与英语写作成绩之间是否存在相关性?若相关,具体表现如何?本研究采用Antconc3.5.8,... 

【文章页数】:77 页

【学位级别】:硕士

【文章目录】:
中文摘要
ABSTRACT
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
Chapter Ⅰ Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
        1.1.1 Requirements for Senior High School English Writing by ECS
        1.1.2 Current Situation of Senior High School Students’English Writing
        1.1.3 Development of Corpus Linguistics in English Writing
    1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
        1.2.1 Research Purpose
        1.2.2 Theoretical Significance
        1.2.3 Practical Significance
    1.3 The Structure of the Paper
Chapter Ⅱ Literature Review
    2.1 Definitions of Key Terms
        2.1.1 The Concept of Cohesion
        2.1.2 The Concept of Lexical Cohesion
    2.2 Theoretical Foundation
        2.2.1 Lexical Cohesion Theory
        2.2.2 The Classification of Lexical Cohesion
            2.2.2.1 Simple Repetition
            2.2.2.2 Complex Repetition
            2.2.2.3 Synonym
            2.2.2.4 Antonym
            2.2.2.5 Hyponym
            2.2.2.6 General Words
            2.2.2.7 Collocation
    2.3 Related Research at Home and Abroad
        2.3.1 Related Research on Lexical Cohesion in Writing Abroad
            2.3.1.1 Research Methods Applied to Lexical Cohesion
            2.3.1.2 The Relationship between Lexical Cohesion and Writing Quality
            2.3.1.3 The Use of Lexical Cohesion in Learners’Writing
        2.3.2 Related Research on Lexical Cohesion and Writing at Home
            2.3.2.1 The Different Theoretical Foundations of Lexical Cohesion inWriting
            2.3.2.2 The Relationship between Lexical Cohesion and Writing Quality.
Chapter Ⅲ Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Research Subjects
    3.3 Research Instruments
        3.3.1 Corpora Used in the Study
        3.3.2 Instrument for Data Processing
    3.4 Research Procedures
        3.4.1 Data Collection
        3.4.2 Evaluation of the Compositions
        3.4.3 Data Analysis
Chapter Ⅳ Results and Discussion
    4.1 The Use of Lexical Cohesion
    4.2 The Differences of the Uses of Lexical Cohesion between HG and LG
        4.2.1 The Differences of Using Simple Repetition between HG and LG
        4.2.2 The Differences of Using Complex Repetition between HG and LG
        4.2.3 The Differences of Using Synonym between HG and LG
        4.2.4 The Differences of Using Antonym between HG and LG
        4.2.5 The Differences of Using Collocation between HG and LG
        4.2.6 A Brief Summary
    4.3 The Correlation between Lexical Cohesion and Writing Scores
        4.3.1 Simple Repetition and Writing Scores
        4.3.2 Complex Repetition and Writing Scores
        4.3.3 Synonym and Writing Scores
        4.3.4 Antonym and Writing Scores
        4.3.5 Hyponym and Writing Scores
        4.3.6 General Words and Writing Scores
        4.3.7 Collocation and Writing Scores
        4.3.8 A Brief Summary
Chapter Ⅴ Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
        5.2.1 Focusing on the Teaching of Complex Repetition
        5.2.2 Focusing on the Teaching of Synonym
        5.2.3 Focusing on the Teaching of Antonym
        5.2.4 Focusing on the Teaching of Collocation
        5.2.5 Focusing on the Inputting of Excellent Compositions in Writing
    5.3 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Further Studies
        5.3.1 Limitations of the Present Study
        5.3.2 Suggestions for Further Studies
References
Appendix
    Appendix Ⅰ Writing Task
    Appendix Ⅱ Writing Samples of Students
    Appendix Ⅲ Composition Scoring Standards of College Entrance Examination
    Appendix Ⅳ Samples of Tagging in Self-Built Corpus
Acknowledgements


【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]基于核心素养的高中英语词汇教学策略探究[J]. 何静.  成才之路. 2020(02)
[2]用思维导图助力英语词汇教学[J]. 朱璇,黄侃.  教育研究与评论(中学教育教学). 2019(12)
[3]英语专业学生不同学习阶段写作中衔接手段运用的比较研究[J]. 杨文星,孙滢.  科教导刊(下旬). 2016(11)
[4]词汇衔接手段在高中英语写作中的使用情况研究[J]. 宁雪娇.  北方文学. 2016(17)
[5]英语写作中语篇衔接手段的教学研究[J]. 崔文琦.  北京化工大学学报(社会科学版). 2016(03)
[6]词汇衔接在中国学生英语写作中的使用研究[J]. 张家园.  出国与就业(就业版). 2011(20)
[7]高中英语写作现状分析及应对措施——基于词汇衔接的角度[J]. 翁志祥.  福建论坛(人文社会科学版). 2011(S1)
[8]词汇衔接与中国学生英语作文质量的关系[J]. 成文艳,王笑施.  科教文汇(下旬刊). 2009(02)
[9]中学生英语高频词汇水平研究[J]. 马广惠.  外语与外语教学. 2006(01)
[10]英语写作中衔接语作用的实证研究[J]. 陈玫.  闽江学院学报. 2005(01)

硕士论文
[1]高中英语写作中词汇衔接手段的使用情况研究[D]. 何桃兰.中央民族大学 2019
[2]高中生英语写作中词汇衔接手段调查研究[D]. 彭辉.重庆师范大学 2018
[3]词汇衔接手段与高中生英语写作成绩的相关性研究[D]. 贾思齐.伊犁师范学院 2018
[4]基于语料库的中英大学生词汇衔接对比研究[D]. 赵晓莉.中北大学 2015
[5]高中英语作文衔接手段使用情况研究[D]. 李琼.湖南师范大学 2012
[6]高中英语写作中词汇衔接手段运用的研究[D]. 杨小清.苏州大学 2011
[7]基于语料库的非英语专业学生写作词汇衔接手段研究[D]. 颜贤斌.北京林业大学 2010
[8]语篇的衔接与高中英语写作教学[D]. 李永红.华中师范大学 2006



本文编号:3709848

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/3709848.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图

版权申明:资料由用户80268***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱[email protected]