以英文为全球性在线语言背景下发展的两种网络语言的语法形式、相似和差异
一、课题来源及研究的目的和意义
（一） 课题来源
语言学之父索绪尔将人类语言从宏观的角度划分为语言和言语两大部分。其中，语言是相对静止的稳固的社会交际工具，而言语是不同社会群体运用语言进行交际的过程和结果。语言具有社会属性，而言语则具有更多的个性色彩。时至今日，多元化已经深入人类文明的每一个领域，任何一种有受众的文化的产生与发展都是对多元化整体的养料，那么语言的多元化也不例外， 尤其是在以信息媒体为介质的网络时代，网络语言深深扎根于网络世界，并借助网络与现实越来越紧密的联系，影响我们的现实语言。特别是作为受众最多的英语，它的网络语言不但影响并受母语为英语的人群影响，也对ESL学习者产生了很大的冲击，英语网络语言的特征有哪些，它的功能，，影响是什么，英文母语使用者和ESL英文学习者的语法差异又是什么？ESL学习者又该如何掌握并且利用这些网络语言，从而提高自己对本土化英语的快速认知。本着解决这些问题的目的，在导师的指导下，本人拟定了本研究题目。
研究目的
本文目的在于研究网络语言应用的概念，语言分析使用母语的个体在应用这些语言中的差异。主要侧重于英文为全球性在线语言背景下发展的两种网络语言的语法形式及相似和差异。对网络语言定义、性质、特点、词汇分类、语法特征、修辞手段等语法角度，以及谐音、缩略、飞白等习惯用法方面进行研究与定义。本文以模因论,、语体学、概念隐喻理论等为理论指导，比较英文母语使用者和中文网络用语使用者的网络语言，以便更加精确地把握和发掘两种网络语言的特征及规律 ，为今后正确使用两种网络语言提供理论基础。
二、国内外研究现状、主要研究内容、研究方法和研究思路
三、阅读的主要参考文献综述
文献综述
参考文献
Aitchison, J. (2013). Language change: Progress of decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Androutsopoulos.J,(2011). Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In Nikolas Coupland and Tore Kristiansen, editors,
Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Novus, Oslo.
Borjas, K. & Burridge, K. (2010). Introducing English grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.
Boyd &K. Crawford.,( 2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5):662–679, May
Boyd, d. m. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burger, J & J, Henderson, (2011). Discriminating gender on twitter. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Bucholtz. M & K.Hall.(2005). Identity and interaction:A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse studies, 7(4-5):585–614.
Driscoll, D. (2002). The ubercool morphology of Internet games: a linguistic analysis. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Engelking, M. & McPherson-Ramirez, G. (2008). Breakthroughs: An integrated advanced English program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, L.,(2006). The development of social network analysis. Empirical Press, Vancouver
Jones. L,(2010). The changing face of spelling on the internet. Technical report, The English Spelling Society
Hong-Mei, S. (2010). A study of the features of Internet English from the linguistic perspective. Studies in Literature and Language 1(7), pp.98-103.
Kabiri, P. and Ghorbani, A.A., (2005). Research on intrusion detection and response: a survey.International Journal of Network Security, 1(2): 84-102
Low, E. & Hashim, A. (2012). English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy and language in use. New York: John Benjamins Publishing.
Liu, T., Xu, J., Qin, T., Xu, J., Xiong, W., and Li, H.( 2007).LETOR: Benchmark Dataset for Research on Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval. SIGIR 2007 Workshop on Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval (LR4IR 2007), 1-10.
Zhou,M & F., Wei. (2012). Joint inference of named entity recognition and normalization for tweets. In Proceedings of ACL
McQuade, S., Colt, J. & Meyer, N. (2009). Cyber bullying: Protecting kids and adults from online bullies. London: ABC-CLIO.
McGonigal, J., (2008). Why I love bees: a case study in collective intelligence gaming. In: K.Salen (Editor), The Ecology of Games: Conntecting Youth, Games and Learning,Cambridge, MA, pp. 199-228
Paolillo.C,(2001). Language variation on internet relay chat: A social network approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(2):180–213
Smith,A& J.Brewer. (2012). Twitter use 2012. Technical report, Pew Research Center, May.
Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2001). Social categories and sociolinguistics: Applying a realist approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 1–19
Thelwall.M,(2009). Homophily in MySpace. J. Am.Soc. Inf. Sci., 60(2):219–231
Thurlow.C,( 2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. J. Computer-Mediated Communication, pages 667–701.
Wu, L. & Ben-Canaan, D. (2006). The impact of globalization and the Internet on English language teaching and learning Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang University
Watt, S. E., Lea, M., & Spears, R. (2002). How social is Internet communication? A reappraisal of bandwidth and anonymity effects. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 61–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhai，C & Lafferty,J,(2004), A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval,ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 179–214
Zorn, I. (2004). Vifu: Virtual community building for networking among women. Gender, Technology and Development, 8(1), 75–95.
本文编号：11753
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/11753.html