论死刑司法控制的体系化展开——基于适用标准的解释路径
发布时间：2019-08-13 17:52
【摘要】：中国现行刑法中的死刑并不是完全意义上的"剥夺生命",而是一个概念集合,需要在不同条文规范中具体理解。在该种"死刑"规范体系中,中国死刑的适用应当遵循相应的进出分流机制,从而体系性地控制死刑的司法适用,实现罪刑均衡。基于严格限制死刑适用的目标共识,《刑法》第48条第1款中的"罪行极其严重"与"必须立即执行"应当分别是限制广义死刑与死刑立即执行的规范依据。"罪行极其严重"的解释,应当强调"罪行"是分则条款中的罪状表述、不包含人身危险性因素,且"极其严重"必须明确可辨;"必须立即执行"的解释,则应围绕人身危险性因素展开,主要通过罪前与罪后情节评估行为人的再犯可能性。
[Abstract]:The death penalty in the current criminal law of China is not a complete sense of "deprivation of life", but a collection of concepts, which needs to be understood concretely in different provisions and norms. In this kind of "death penalty" standard system, the application of death penalty in China should follow the corresponding mechanism of diversion in and out, so as to systematically control the judicial application of death penalty and realize the balance between crime and punishment. Based on the consensus on the objective of strictly restricting the application of the death penalty, the words "extremely serious crimes" and "must be carried out immediately" in article 48, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code should be the normative basis for restricting the death penalty in a broad sense and the immediate execution of the death penalty, respectively. " In the interpretation of "crime is extremely serious", it should be emphasized that "crime" is the expression of guilt in the sub-clause, which does not contain personal dangerousness factors, and "extremely serious" must be clearly distinguished; the interpretation of "must be carried out immediately" should be carried out around the personal dangerousness factor, mainly through the circumstances before and after the crime to assess the possibility of recidivism of the perpetrator.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(15BFX085)
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2526265
[Abstract]:The death penalty in the current criminal law of China is not a complete sense of "deprivation of life", but a collection of concepts, which needs to be understood concretely in different provisions and norms. In this kind of "death penalty" standard system, the application of death penalty in China should follow the corresponding mechanism of diversion in and out, so as to systematically control the judicial application of death penalty and realize the balance between crime and punishment. Based on the consensus on the objective of strictly restricting the application of the death penalty, the words "extremely serious crimes" and "must be carried out immediately" in article 48, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code should be the normative basis for restricting the death penalty in a broad sense and the immediate execution of the death penalty, respectively. " In the interpretation of "crime is extremely serious", it should be emphasized that "crime" is the expression of guilt in the sub-clause, which does not contain personal dangerousness factors, and "extremely serious" must be clearly distinguished; the interpretation of "must be carried out immediately" should be carried out around the personal dangerousness factor, mainly through the circumstances before and after the crime to assess the possibility of recidivism of the perpetrator.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(15BFX085)
【分类号】：D924.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈增宝;死刑司法控制的观念与实践[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2004年06期
2 吴大华;论少数民族犯罪的司法控制[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2005年01期
3 杨诚;;死刑司法控制的美国模式之研究与借鉴[J];刑法论丛;2010年02期
4 陈坦松;罪刑法定的代价及其司法控制[J];华东政法学院学报;2002年06期
5 杨诚;;死刑司法控制的美国模式之研究与借鉴[J];政治与法律;2008年11期
6 梁丽佳;;中国死刑司法控制之思考[J];青年与社会;2013年06期
7 储槐植;;死刑司法控制:完整解读刑法第四十八条[J];中外法学;2012年05期
8 聂立泽;;我国抢劫罪死刑司法控制研究[J];政治与法律;2008年11期
9 张磊;余金;;受虐人群杀人案件的死刑司法控制研究[J];法学杂志;2010年03期
10 杨俊;;死刑司法控制的程序性路径分析——以死刑复核权之回归为视角[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2007年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 韦丽;中国死刑司法控制研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
，本文编号：2526265
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2526265.html
