当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 行政管理论文 >

政府透明度与社交在加强公民信任不同层面中的运用:来自加纳的经验证

发布时间:2024-03-26 18:59
  政府的透明度吸引了来自不同层面的大量研究,透明度质量和背景得到改善。通过加纳的理论亮点和分析调查,这项研究有助于持续辩论透明度,并进一步评估政府如何建立对加纳公民的信任,以信任他们的日常运作。通过研究总结了文献中的概念,提出了六个不同的维度,以促进透明度指标,解决公共问责制,服务提供,城乡发展,政府效率和社交媒体使用等领域的透明度提升问题。信息披露。但是,提供的维度在提供公民和政府信息的潜在用户需要听取的信息,增强对公民的服务以及影响公民信任方面得到了令人满意的解决。此外,来自加纳的实证结果验证了所提出的模型的准确性,并根据公民在拟议区域内鼓励加强的频率来检查这些变量的变化。实证结果支持了我们的假设,并表明在每个方面都有很好的尺寸和可接受的负荷。对分析的调查结果显示,社会媒体利用各方面与公民沟通,以影响对政府的信任,这是一个重要的预测。该研究表明,大多数公民更愿意选择通过社交媒体在政府中使用的方式,来信息来覆盖大多数公民。

【文章页数】:134 页

【学位级别】:硕士

【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
Lists of Abbreviations
List of Symbols
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 Background
    1.3 Problem Statement
    1.4 Purpose of the Study
    1.5 Objectives
    1.6 Research Questions
    1.7 Outline of the Study
Chapter 2 Literature and Conceptual Framework
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Literature Review
        2.2.1 Perceptions of Government and Social media use in Ghana
        2.2.2 Trends in Social Media Use to Enhance Transparency
        2.2.3 Perception of Government Services-(Dis) Satisfaction
        2.2.4 Trust in Government and Citizens
        2.2.5 Transparency in Government
        2.2.6 The Public Expectations of Transparency on Corruption
    2.3 Hypothesis Development
        2.3.1 Public Accountability (PA);
        2.3.2 Service Delivery Quality (SDQ);
        2.3.3 Urban and Rural Development (URD);
        2.3.4 Government Effectiveness (GEf);
        2.3.5 Social Media Use by Government (SMU);
        2.3.6 Citizens Trust in Government (CT);
Chapter 3 Methodology
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Study Area
    3.3 Research Design
    3.4 The Rationale for Selection of Mixed Research Method
    3.5 Research Methodology
        3.5.1 Reasons for the Selection of Ghana as a Choice for Case Study
        3.5.2 Study Population and Sampling Techniques
        3.5.3 Sampling Procedure and Size
        3.5.4 Respondents Description (Characteristics)
    3.6 Data Collection Sources
        3.6.1 Empirical Settings,Survey Validation,and Data Collection Process
    3.7 Interpretation of applying IBM SPSS and Lisrel 8.80 Software
    3.8 Research Quality Assessment and Reliability
    3.9 Ethical Standards and Considerations
    3.10 Measurement Assessment and Reliability
        3.10.1 Measurement Validation
Chapter 4 Data Results, Analysis and Interpretation
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Description of Dependent and Demographic Variables
    4.3 Descriptive Statistics for Variables
        4.3.1 Test for Reliability of Independent Variables
        4.3.2 Mediator and Dependent Variable Reliability Test
    4.4 Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Bivariate Correlation Test
    4.5 Validating the Proposed Model
        4.5.1 Model fitness and hypothesis test results
        4.5.2 Descriptive Statistics of Measurement Variables
        4.5.3 Model Results of Fit Indices
        4.5.4 Correlations and Structural Path Analysis
    4.6 Pictorial view of structural models from Lisrel 8.80 Analysis
Chapter 5 Discussions
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Impact of Demographic Sample on the Study
    5.3 Role of the Mediation of SMU on the Study
    5.4 Impacts of the General Study
Chapter 6 Conclusion, Implication and Limitation of the Study
References
Appendixes
    Appendix A: Abbreviations
    Appendix B: Measurement Items
    Appendix C: Summarized Responses from the Interview Section
    Appendix D: Statistics on Responses of Interviews
Acknowledgements
Academic Articles and Research Outcomes Study Period
    Published Articles (Co-authored):
    Under Review Article (To be published when accepted):



本文编号:3939536

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/3939536.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图

版权申明:资料由用户f304b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com