《乔家大院》中会话含义对人物性格塑造的研究

发布时间：2021-10-15 03:22

　　《乔家大院》是一部以真人真事为依托的历史小说。小说讲述了一代巨商乔致庸在商业上取得巨大成功在感情上遭遇坎坷波澜壮阔的一生。小说里绝大部分篇幅由对话组成,而对话是体现研究人物性格的重要条件之一。目前有很多关于人物对话塑造人物性格的研究,但是大部分是文学领域的研究,很少有人研究人物对话过程中违反合作原则产生会话含义这一现象是如何帮助塑造人物性格的。本文采取语用学理论与文学研究相结合的方法,将一般（无会话含义的）对话对人物性格塑造的作用与与会话含义对人物性格塑造的作用进行对比分析,目的是突出会话含义在塑造人物性格时的特殊作用,以及会话含义对小说创作产生的影响。本文采用了数据分析法以及定性分析法与定量分析法相结合的研究方法对小说中的对话进行了研究。本文对小说中出现的五位主要人物的对话进行了对比分析。其中三位女性分别是江雪瑛、陆玉菡、曹氏,两位男性分别是乔致庸和孙茂才。这五位人物引导着小说的发展并且各自有大量的对话可以进行研究对比。本文首先从一般对话分析人物的主导性格和非主导性格,通过列举经典对话揭示对话中隐藏的人物性格。其次本文选取五位角色违反合作原则时的经典对话,分析对话中的会话含义以及它是... 

【文章来源】：华中师范大学湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：72 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgement
摘要
Abstract
1. Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Significance of the research
    1.3 Outline of the thesis
2. Literature Review
    2.1 Studies of Qiao's Family Compund
    2.2 Studies of conversational implicature
    2.3 Studies of literary pragmatics
3. Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Cooperative principle
        3.1.1 Grice's four maxims
        3.1.2 Flouting of four maxims
    3.2 Conversational implicature
        3.2.1 Generalized implicature and particularized implicature
        3.2.2 Standard implicature and non-stsndard implicature
        3.2.3 Properties of conversational implicature
        3.2.4 Conversational implicature and conventional implicature
    3.3 Charecterization
        3.3.1 Predominant character
            3.3.1.1 Identification of predominant character
            3.3.1.2 Manifestation of predominant character
        3.3.2 Non-predominant character
        3.3.3 Characterization in conversation
4. Characterization through Conversational Implicature
    4.1 Characterization through conversation without conversaional implicature
        4.1.1 Predominant and non-predominant character of three females
            4.1.1.1 Character of Jiang Xueying
            4.1.1.2 Character of Lu Yuhan
            4.1.1.3 Character of Mrs.Cao
        4.1.2 Predominant and Don-predominant character of two males
            4.1.2.1 Character of Qiao Zhiyong
            4.1.2.2 Character of Sun Maocai
    4.2 Characterization through conversational implicature
        4.2.1 Flouting of quality maxim
            4.2.1.1 Offering false information
            4.2.1.2 Offering information lacking evidence
        4.2.2 Flouting of relation maxim
    4.3 Comparison of two kinds of characterization
        4.3.1 Quantity comparison
        4.3.2 Quality comparison
    4.4 Pragmatic functions of characterization through conversational implicature innovels
        4.4.1 Being vivid
        4.4.2 Being concise
        4.4.3 Being persuasive
5. Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings of the research
    5.2 Implications for future studies
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions
Bibliography



本文编号：3437332