英国都铎王朝的语言与文化研究
发布时间：2018-09-01 11:50
【摘要】： 本文主要研究英国都铎王朝的语言与文化。英国都铎王朝所处的时代(1485-1603)是英国封建制度开始瓦解、资本主义经济与生产关系萌生并迅速发展的时代,也是文艺复兴、宗教改革、政体改革、海外扩展促进了英国近代思想文化、英语语言、科学技术迅速发展的时代。 文化则是世界各个民族对特定环境的适应能力及其适应成果的总和。文化的发展离不开语言,语言又是文化最主要的组成部分。文化和语言的发展相辅相成,有着深厚的联系,而英国都铎王朝的悠久历史正是这种联系的见证。把语言与特定的文化环境和社会背景联系起来,是论文作者从事英国都铎王朝语言与文化专题研究的一种尝试。 在阐释语言文化学和社会语言学理论的基础上,本研究把对英国都铎王朝语言与文化的研究置于跨学科、多模态的理论研究框架中,整合英国都铎王朝语言和英国都铎王朝文化的研究成果,对构建语言文化学和社会语言学科的理论基质进行梳理解析。本研究比较全面、系统地勾勒了英国都铎王朝时期语言与文化的发展及其互动关系。 本研究在对英国都铎王朝的文化特征(宗教改革、政体改革、文艺复兴、海外扩张等)以及英国都铎王朝的语言特征(语言是性别的折射、语言是阶层的镜子、语言是地域的见证、语言是语域的创新等)进行系统分析的基础上,运用语言文化学和社会语言学的理论,有效利用了早期英语通信语料库(CEEC)的相关资料,揭示了英国都铎王朝语言与文化的互动过程以及相辅相成的关系。 本研究还从语言的文化性质、语言的文化价值、语言的文化气质、语言的文化交流等角度出发,系统探讨了社会文化因素与语言使用关系、社会生活因素与语言结构的关系以及社会政治文化与语言发展的关系,从而证明英国都铎王朝语言与文化发展之间相辅相成的关系对英国资本主义发展起到了重要的促进作用。 系统分析英国都铎王朝语言与文化的研究结果需要满足三个效度要求：实证效度、社会效度和历史效度。论文作者以早期英语通信语料库(CEEC)为研究对象,以语言是性别的折射、语言是阶层的镜子、语言是地区的见证和语言是语域的创新为切入点,通过研究性别变量、阶层变量、地区变量和语域变量,对英国都铎王朝时期文化与语言的互动关系进行了系统地研究。 本研究从以下四个方面,对英国都铎王朝语言与文化的研究结果分别给予具体论述：1)促使语言发展的地区因素；2)语言反映社会阶层的构成；3)展示语言发展的性别因素；4)语域揭示语言与文化互动。 研究结果表明,到英国都铎王朝时期,伦敦已经发展成为英语发展的中心。财富与权力的高度集中是伦敦得到迅速发展的重要因素。因此,伦敦地区成为促使英语语言发展最重要的地区因素。特别是1558年前后,英国在人口统计、政治生活、经济状况、社会阶层、宗教文化等方面发生了巨大的变化,因而社会阶层变量对研究英国都铎王朝时期语言的特征具有重要的影响力。英国都铎王朝时期的男性,在英语书信写作中,引领部分英语语言演变的过程。 本研究把地区、性别、语域作为自变量,把ye/you、-th/-s、动名词短语、mine,thine/my,thy以及the which/which等语言变异作为因变量,进行多变量分析,以揭示语言与文化的互动性。研究结果显示,在整个都铎王朝英语语言发展的过程中,地区和性别是对英语语言发展影响最大的因素；语域是对英语语言发展影响最小的因素。口语体裁的私人信件比官方文件的书面体裁更有可能催生语言创新。 早期英语通信语料库CEEC收集到的大部分历史语料来自于具有上等或中等社会地位的男性,而来自于社会底层的历史语料相当有限。因此,“英国都铎王朝的语言与文化研究”所作的分析仅代表英国都铎王朝所研究语言发展的部分社会分布,不能全面代表英国都铎王朝所研究语言发展的社会分布,这种历史语料有待更深入、全面的挖掘。 如何把“英国都铎王朝的语言与文化研究”成果有效地运用于指导今后的英语教学实践和英国学研究,如何进一步提高学生的英语综合素质、文化背景知识及英语语言的运用能力,这些方面的理论探讨和实证研究是论文作者今后的主要研究方向。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly studies the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain. The Tudor Dynasty (1485-1603) was the time when the feudal system of Britain began to collapse, capitalist economy and production relations sprouted and developed rapidly. It was also the time of the Renaissance, religious reform, political reform, and overseas expansion promoted the modern British culture, English and English. The era of rapid development of science and technology.
Culture is the sum total of the adaptability of all nations in the world to a particular environment and the results of their adaptation.The development of culture is inseparable from language, and language is the most important part of culture.The development of culture and language complement each other and have a deep connection.The long history of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain is the witness of this connection. It is an attempt by the author to study the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in England that the specific cultural environment and social background are connected.
On the basis of explaining the theories of linguistic culture and sociolinguistics, this study places the study of the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in the framework of interdisciplinary and multimodal theory, integrates the research results of the language of the Tudor Dynasty and the culture of the Tudor Dynasty, and builds the theoretical foundation of linguistic culture and sociolinguistics. This study is comprehensive and systematically outlines the development and interaction of language and culture in the Tudor dynasty.
Based on a systematic analysis of the cultural features of the Tudor Dynasty (religious reform, political reform, Renaissance, overseas expansion, etc.) and the linguistic features of the Tudor Dynasty (language is a reflection of gender, language is a mirror of class, language is a witness of region, language is a register innovation, etc.), this study applies linguistic culturology. Based on sociolinguistic theories, the early English Communications Corpus (CEEC) is effectively used to reveal the interactive process of language and culture in the Tudor Dynasty and the complementary relationship between them.
From the perspectives of the cultural nature of language, its cultural value, its cultural temperament, and its cultural exchange, this study also explores systematically the relationship between social and cultural factors and language use, between social life factors and language structure, and between social, political, cultural and linguistic development, thus proving the English Tudor language. The complementary relationship between language and cultural development played an important role in promoting the development of British capitalism.
Systematic analysis of the results of the study of language and culture in the Tudor Dynasty requires three validity requirements: empirical validity, social validity and historical validity. From the perspective of gender, class, region and register, this paper makes a systematic study of the interaction between culture and language in the Tudor Dynasty.
This study is devoted to the following four aspects: 1) the regional factors that promote language development; 2) language reflects the composition of social strata; 3) the gender factors in language development; and 4) register reveals the interaction between language and culture.
The results show that by the time of the Tudor dynasty, London had become the centre of English development. The concentration of wealth and power was an important factor in the rapid development of London. Great changes have taken place in economy, social stratum, religion and culture, so social stratum variables have an important influence on the study of the language characteristics of the Tudor Dynasty in England.
This study takes region, gender, register as independent variables, and ye / you, - th /- s, gerund phrase, mine, thine / my, thy and the which / while as dependent variables to reveal the interaction between language and culture. The greatest influence on the development of the English language; register is the least influence on the development of the English language. Private letters of spoken language are more likely to promote language innovation than written letters of official documents.
Most of the historical corpus collected by CEEC is from men of high or middle social status, while the historical corpus from the bottom of the society is rather limited. Therefore, the analysis of "the study of language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain" represents only some of the societies of language development studied by the Tudor Dynasty in Britain. It can not fully represent the social distribution of the language development studied by the Tudor Dynasty. This historical corpus needs to be excavated more thoroughly and comprehensively.
How to effectively apply the achievements of "the study of language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty" to the future English teaching practice and English research, how to further improve the students'comprehensive English quality, cultural background knowledge and the ability to use English language, these theoretical and empirical studies will be the future of the author of this paper. Main research directions.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：H310.1;K561.4
本文编号：2217114
[Abstract]:This paper mainly studies the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain. The Tudor Dynasty (1485-1603) was the time when the feudal system of Britain began to collapse, capitalist economy and production relations sprouted and developed rapidly. It was also the time of the Renaissance, religious reform, political reform, and overseas expansion promoted the modern British culture, English and English. The era of rapid development of science and technology.
Culture is the sum total of the adaptability of all nations in the world to a particular environment and the results of their adaptation.The development of culture is inseparable from language, and language is the most important part of culture.The development of culture and language complement each other and have a deep connection.The long history of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain is the witness of this connection. It is an attempt by the author to study the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in England that the specific cultural environment and social background are connected.
On the basis of explaining the theories of linguistic culture and sociolinguistics, this study places the study of the language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in the framework of interdisciplinary and multimodal theory, integrates the research results of the language of the Tudor Dynasty and the culture of the Tudor Dynasty, and builds the theoretical foundation of linguistic culture and sociolinguistics. This study is comprehensive and systematically outlines the development and interaction of language and culture in the Tudor dynasty.
Based on a systematic analysis of the cultural features of the Tudor Dynasty (religious reform, political reform, Renaissance, overseas expansion, etc.) and the linguistic features of the Tudor Dynasty (language is a reflection of gender, language is a mirror of class, language is a witness of region, language is a register innovation, etc.), this study applies linguistic culturology. Based on sociolinguistic theories, the early English Communications Corpus (CEEC) is effectively used to reveal the interactive process of language and culture in the Tudor Dynasty and the complementary relationship between them.
From the perspectives of the cultural nature of language, its cultural value, its cultural temperament, and its cultural exchange, this study also explores systematically the relationship between social and cultural factors and language use, between social life factors and language structure, and between social, political, cultural and linguistic development, thus proving the English Tudor language. The complementary relationship between language and cultural development played an important role in promoting the development of British capitalism.
Systematic analysis of the results of the study of language and culture in the Tudor Dynasty requires three validity requirements: empirical validity, social validity and historical validity. From the perspective of gender, class, region and register, this paper makes a systematic study of the interaction between culture and language in the Tudor Dynasty.
This study is devoted to the following four aspects: 1) the regional factors that promote language development; 2) language reflects the composition of social strata; 3) the gender factors in language development; and 4) register reveals the interaction between language and culture.
The results show that by the time of the Tudor dynasty, London had become the centre of English development. The concentration of wealth and power was an important factor in the rapid development of London. Great changes have taken place in economy, social stratum, religion and culture, so social stratum variables have an important influence on the study of the language characteristics of the Tudor Dynasty in England.
This study takes region, gender, register as independent variables, and ye / you, - th /- s, gerund phrase, mine, thine / my, thy and the which / while as dependent variables to reveal the interaction between language and culture. The greatest influence on the development of the English language; register is the least influence on the development of the English language. Private letters of spoken language are more likely to promote language innovation than written letters of official documents.
Most of the historical corpus collected by CEEC is from men of high or middle social status, while the historical corpus from the bottom of the society is rather limited. Therefore, the analysis of "the study of language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty in Britain" represents only some of the societies of language development studied by the Tudor Dynasty in Britain. It can not fully represent the social distribution of the language development studied by the Tudor Dynasty. This historical corpus needs to be excavated more thoroughly and comprehensively.
How to effectively apply the achievements of "the study of language and culture of the Tudor Dynasty" to the future English teaching practice and English research, how to further improve the students'comprehensive English quality, cultural background knowledge and the ability to use English language, these theoretical and empirical studies will be the future of the author of this paper. Main research directions.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：H310.1;K561.4
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋娟;浅谈中国传统思维方式对英语学习的负效应[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2004年01期
2 杨正翠;李晓红;;浅析隐喻的显式和隐式[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2008年02期
3 李万立;;析语篇连贯[J];安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报;2005年04期
4 周明;称呼语的语用特征及其语用翻译[J];安徽大学学报;2000年03期
5 乐金声;通过喻体对照探讨英汉比喻互译的途径[J];安徽大学学报;2000年05期
6 俞莲年;语言的特殊性与口译[J];安徽大学学报;2002年04期
7 张蓊荟,沈晓红;英汉翻译过程中推理的作用[J];安徽大学学报;2003年01期
8 刘俊香;光的启示——谈“能被理解的存在是语言”[J];安徽大学学报;2003年04期
9 裴文;语言流变过程状态的时空观解释[J];安徽大学学报;2005年01期
10 程洪珍;东西方传统思维方式与英汉语言差异[J];安徽大学学报;2005年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 张淑均;;俄汉语言接触中东干语的变异现象[A];首届海峡两岸外语教学与研究学术研讨会暨福建省外国语文学会2011年会论文集[C];2011年
2 杨慧琼;杜建华;;受众为何按照谣言而不是新闻行事?——对2010年两起地震谣言的比较分析[A];中国传媒大学第五届全国新闻学与传播学博士生学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
3 熊德米;;模糊性法律语言及其翻译[A];边缘法学论坛[C];2005年
4 袁瑛;;刍议侦查语言学[A];边缘法学论坛[C];2005年
5 王虹;;警察语言的词汇特点研究[A];边缘法学论坛[C];2005年
6 谢宏滨;;论法律语言的社会学属性[A];边缘法学论坛[C];2005年
7 简耀;;高职英语文化教学中的问题及对策[A];2011无锡职教教师论坛论文集[C];2012年
8 蒋永甫;;现代国家构建中的公共预算——一种财政国家的视角[A];第二届中国公共预算研究全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
9 施雪华;;改革开放30年中国共产党对中国特色社会主义政治发展道路的理论探索[A];改革开放与理论创新——第二届北京中青年社科理论人才“百人工程”学者论坛文集[C];2008年
10 魏玉山;;国外新闻出版国家监管体制[A];中国编辑研究（2006）[C];2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吴丹;语言学术语汉译规范化研究[D];南昌航空大学;2010年
2 李玲玲;英语教师课堂非语言行为对学生情绪的调节作用[D];南昌航空大学;2010年
3 李敏;对罗斯福和奥巴马就职演说的及物性分析[D];山东科技大学;2010年
4 江玉娟;论中文企业简介的英译[D];山东科技大学;2010年
5 王明亮;人称指示映射现象的认知研究[D];山东科技大学;2010年
6 陈丹;英汉远近指示语的对比研究[D];山东科技大学;2010年
7 许丹;英语广告语中语用预设的研究[D];山东科技大学;2010年
8 赵才华;会话含义及其在大学英语听力教学中应用的实证研究[D];山东科技大学;2010年
9 宋文平;现代汉语“A而不B”格式的多角度研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
10 于树军;50至70年代合作化小说情爱叙事分析[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
，本文编号：2217114
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2217114.html
