《西游记》和《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》的主题比较

发布时间：2021-11-14 23:44

　　本文以全新的视角来研读这两部流传已久、脍炙人口的游记巨著,通过故事情节、主人公、语体风格、社会意义、宗教信仰、及小说结局等方面比较研究二者的主题,结合原有的一些观点进一步探讨,试图填补将此两部巨著进行比较研究的学术空白,找出其异同点和带来这些异同点的具体原因。《西游记》和《哈克贝利?费恩历险记》这两部巨著,虽然产生于不同的国度环境和时代背景,但经过多次仔细阅读和研究,笔者发现它们存在着很多的可联系之处,其中包括很多相似之处,尤其是这两部巨著深邃而多层次的主题之间,存在着文学研究上的可比性。这两部作品在各自的文学史上,甚至在世界文学史上,都占有重要的地位。它们持久的魅力和强大的生命力主要在于它们的主题:深远而多角度,历久祢新,给每个时代的读者以深刻启迪。也正因为这个原因,作为属于全人类和所有时代的两大奇书,这两部鸿篇巨制,一直受到中西学者的重视和瞩目。经过系统的考察研究,笔者发现学术界对二者的研究尽管很多很深,涉及的视角和层面也很广泛,但都是分别单独地去研究这两部作品,而对二者进行比较研究的工作和著述几乎没有。笔者在仔细对比阅读和研究后发现:在情节方面,两部作品都涉及游记探险,寻求目的地... 

【文章来源】：上海交通大学上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：81 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract(Chinese)
Abstract(English)
Acknowledgement
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 General Introduction of Journey to the West
        1.1.1 Identity of the author
        1.1.2 General Intruduction of the work
    1.2 General Introduction of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
        1.2.1 General Introduction of the author
        1.2.2 General Introduction of the work
    1.3 Introduction to thesis statement
Chapter 2 Comparison on Plots
    2.1 The adventures and regional customs, stories
        2.1.1 In and out the Tang Territory vs. worlds on and off the bank
        2.1.2 Leaving the Tang Territory vs. leaving the bank
    2.2 Battle between the justice and the injustice
        2.2.1 The Monkey King and feudality vs. Huck ( Jim) and the slavery
        2.2.2 Scripture group and human evils, ghosts vs. Huck, Jim and the bank people
    2.3 The kidnapping and rescue of the protagonists
        2.3.1 The kidnapped: Sanzang, the Tang Priest vs. the slave Jim
        2.3.2 The rescuers: The Monkey King and Huck
Chapter 3 Comparison on Protagonists
    3.1 The Monkey King and Huck
        3.1.1 Both “primitive”
        3.1.2 Both rebellious
        3.1.3 Both in pursuit of freedom
        3.1.4 Both with vernacular
        3.1.5 Both as heroic prototype
    3.2 The Tang Priest and the slave Jim
        3.2.1 Both impacted by religion and social systems
        3.2.2 Both partial failures
        3.2.3 80th as wanderers
Chapter 4 Comparison on Type of Writing
    4.1 Type of writing concerning the protagonists
    4.2 General type of writing as a whole
Chapter 5 Comparison on Social Significances
    5.1 Both works revealing the social realities
        5.1.1 The social evils in both adventures
        5.1.2 Adventures of Monkey King and Huck
    5.2 Both works implicit on political malpractices
        5.2.1 Against feudality vs. against slavery
        5.2.2 Agaist Cheng-Zhu Philosophy vs. for democracy
    5.3 Comparison on Religion-Related Aspects
        5.3.1 Profound impacts of Buddhism and Christianity
        5.3.2 Relations between individuality and religion:
            5.3.2.1 The Monkey King and Buddhism vs. Huck and Christianity
            5.3.2.2 The Master Sanzang and Buddhism vs.the Slave Jim and Christianity
Chpter 6 Comparison on the Epilogues
    6.1 Both protagonists being “compromising”
    6.2 Both works leaving imaginational space in the epilogues
Chapter7 Conclusion
    7.1 Conclusion of the research
    7.2 Limitation of this research
    7.3 Suggestions for future researches
Bibliography
Appendixes
    Appendix 1:
    Appendix 2:


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]理想与现实的互斥——评《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》[J]. 朱莉,高英娟.  美与时代. 2004(05)
[2]自由的人格——析《西游记》中孙悟空的人格形象之一[J]. 江少英.  福建师大福清分校学报. 2004(01)
[3]论明人对《西游记》的认识[J]. 王齐洲.  社会科学研究. 2004(01)
[4]简评《哈克贝里·费恩历险记》[J]. 尼玛布赤.  西藏大学学报(汉文版). 2002(01)
[5]言为心声——《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》的口语化风格浅析[J]. 刘永杰,王艳玲.  山东师大外国语学院学报. 2001(04)
[6]《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》中的种族冲突与融合[J]. 王晓莉.  辽宁师专学报(社会科学版). 2000(05)
[7]《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》的写作特点和人物形象[J]. 白逸欣,蔡宏宇.  云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2000(02)
[8]三棱镜:说《西游记》旨趣的隐显多元[J]. 乔力.  东岳论丛. 1999(06)
[9]河与岸的象征意义——小议《哈克贝利费恩历险记》[J]. 李德娟.  语文学刊. 1999(04)
[10]《西游记》作者确为吴承恩辨[J]. 蔡铁鹰.  晋阳学刊. 1997(02)



本文编号：3495593