从印象管理角度研究公众人物道歉话语

发布时间：2021-10-09 18:03

　　道歉是人们生活中不可避免地会使用到的一种为不适当或有危害的言行承认错误,同时表示歉意的的常见言语行为。前人对这一现象的研究也不乏少数,但最初只停留于对这一言语行为理论层面的研究,进而逐步转为实证性研究。其涉及领域相对较广,但却似乎始终在围绕日常话语道歉所涉及到的的各因素如社会距离、社会权势、冒犯程度、性别、文化等变量因素加以分析验证。本研究旨在突破前人对道歉话语的研究对象和手段范畴,即区别于日常话语道歉,转而以公众人物为研究对象,透过他们的道歉话语来剖析作为身份特殊的人物在表达歉意时所蕴含的背后动机和特有的语言操作策略。特别是通过分析如何最低限度地降低和推卸责任的具体实施手段,以达到保全或挽回自身面子和维护自身公众形象的目的,证明这一言语行为所体现的自我印象管理模式。本文以Leary和Kowalski（1990）提出的印象管理两成分或两过程管理模式为理论框架。由于本文是鉴于以语用学路向分析研究对象的话语现象,因此不涉及到对印象管理模式的测量或相关因素验证。具体而言,印象动机就是要研究哪些印象动机因素会驱使公众人物去道歉；印象建构是要研究通过哪些话语策略使得道歉方去修补或保持先前给予受歉... 

【文章来源】：山西大学山西省

【文章页数】：89 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 The Object of the Research
    1.3 The Rationale of the Research
    1.4 Problems Existing in the Past Studies
    1.5 The Objectives of the Research
    1.6 Methodology and Data Collections
    1.7 Outline of the Thesis
Chapter Two A Review of the Relevant Literature
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Approaches to the Study of an Apology
        2.2.1 The Pragmatics Approach
        2.2.2 The Sociological Approach
        2.2.3 The Conversation Analysis Approach
        2.2.4 The Psychological Approach
        2.2.5 The Cross-Cultural Approach
    2.3 Achievements and Limitations Existing in the Previous Studies
    2.4 The Perspective of the Present Study
    2.5 Summary
Chapter Three A Description of the Conceptual Framework
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 The Delimitation of Mundane Apology and Public Apology
    3.3 Working Definitions of Genuine Apology and Ostensible Apology
    3.4 A Social Psychological Approach to the Study of Public Apology
        3.4.1 Impression Management(IM)
        3.4.2 The two-component model of Impression Management
    3.5 The Framework of the Present Study
        3.5.1 Public apologies as a result of impression motivation
        3.5.2 Public apology strategies as a realization of impression construction
    3.6 Reasons to choose Impression Management Theory as the Theoretical Framework
    3.7 Summary
Chapter Four The Analysis of Apologetic Discourse from Public Figures Basedon IM
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Impression Motivation of Apologizing
        4.2.1 Maintaining self-esteem and/or saving Face
        4.2.2 Avoiding responsibilities
        4.2.3 Setting public-desired models
    4.3 Impression Construction of Apologizing
        4.3.1 Impression construction of assertive tactics for genuine apologies
        4.3.2 Impression construction of defensive tactics for ostensible apologies
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five The Pragmatic Functions of Public Apologies
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Communicative functions
        5.2.1 Maintaining a positive or remedying a negative impression
        5.2.2 Shortening social distance and establishing intimate relationship
    5.3 Instrumental functions
        5.3.1 Realizing some specific discourse purpose
        5.3.2 Retrieving (in-) tangible loss caused by wrongdoing
    5.4 Summary
Chapter Six The Pragmatic Effects of Public Apologies
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Positive effects
        6.2.1 Minimizing the face-threatening effects
        6.2.2 Evading the embarrassing social situation
        6.2.3 Improving and remedying the harmonious interpersonal relationship
    6.3 Negative effects
        6.3.1 Being suspected of the apologetic sincerity
        6.3.2 Amplifying the negative public image
    6.4 Zero effects
    6.5 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Introduction
    7.2 Major Findings
    7.3 Implications
    7.4 Limitations
    7.5 Suggestions for Further Study
Bibliography
附录: 在校期间发表的论文


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]道歉行为的话语模式与语用特点分析[J]. 李军.  语言教学与研究. 2007(01)
[2]现代汉语道歉言语行为策略研究[J]. 王燕,徐慧.  现代语文. 2006(11)
[3]汉英致歉策略在社会距离中的分布[J]. 肖涌.  西南交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2005(05)
[4]对“道歉语”的语用定量研究[J]. 刘思,刘润清.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2005(05)

硕士论文
[1]致歉言语行为研究[D]. 周林艳.吉林大学 2008
[2]关于现代汉语道歉言语行为的初步研究[D]. 康红霞.天津师范大学 2008
[3]汉语致歉言语行为研究[D]. 胡明伟.吉林大学 2006



本文编号：3426767