庭审会话中特指问句的话语结构及信息功能
发布时间：2024-01-30 06:02
“问答”是法庭审判的核心组成部分,也是最富有动态意义和研究意义的部分。在中国刑事审判中,“问答”虽为不可分割的整体,但普遍遵循“问在前,答在后”的原则,从而使问话具有主导性,控制庭审主题,决定庭审进程。简言之,就庭审特指问句而言,问话的结构和方式比问话内容更加重要。另外,汉语是一种声调语言,人们交流时语调的各个部分都会对话语信息的传递产生影响。因此,法庭问话要想实现问话目的,除了选择恰当的问话结构,还必须注重语调的参与。语调的信息功能在“有声性”庭审会话研究中显得尤为重要。基于对国内19场刑事案件转写语料的分析,本文采用定量和定性的研究方法,从主位-述位和焦点分布的角度,对语料中296个特指问句的话语结构进行归纳,并借助Praat语音分析软件,分析在语调各部分的共同作用下,庭审特指问句的不同话语结构所蕴含的主要信息功能。根据研究结果,本文共归纳出庭审特指问句的3种主要话语结构,即(1)主位+述位,疑问焦点位于述位;(2)主位空缺,疑问焦点位于述位;(3)主位与疑问焦点重合,置于句首。上述三种结构中,主位的信息性质并非固定于已知信息,在前两种结构中,主位代表已知信息,而在第三种结构中,主...
【文章页数】：69 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Research Objective and Significance
1.2 Methodology
1.2.1 Research Corpus
1.2.2 Research Instrument
1.2.3 Research Question
1.3 Organization
2 Literature Review
2.1 Previous Studies on Wh-question
2.1.1 Position of Wh-question in Chinese Interrogative System
2.1.2 Previous Studies on Chinese Wh-question
2.2 Previous Studies on Courtroom Discourse
2.2.1 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Structure and Form
2.2.2 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Interaction
2.2.3 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Power
2.3 Situation of Studies on Chinese Courtroom Discourse in CNKI
3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Theme-Rheme Theory
3.2 Focus Theory
3.2.1 Domestic Viewpoints on the Concept “Focus”
3.2.2 Classifications of the Focus
3.3 The Overall Theoretical Framework
4 Discourse Structures and Informative Function of Wh-question in ChineseCourtroom Discourse
4.1 Basic Information of Criminal Trial Conversations
4.1.1 General Introduction to Chinese Criminal Trials
4.1.2 Roles of Criminal Trial Participants
4.2 Intonation Nucleus
4.3 Classifications and Applications of Discourse Structures of Wh-question inChinese Courtroom Discourse
4.4 Informative Functions of Wh-question in Chinese Courtroom Discourse
4.4.1 Theme + rheme, with the focus on the latter: reconfirm the giveninformation
4.4.2 Null theme, rheme occurs in the sentence-initial position with the focus
4.4.2.1 In-depth inquiry
4.4.2.2 Strengthening the cooperative communication
4.4.2.3 Confirmation and verification
4.4.3 Theme + rheme, with the focus in the first section: express speaker’ssubjective attitude
4.5 Applications of Informative Functions of Wh-question in Chinese CourtroomDiscourse
5 Conclusion
5.1 General Conclusions
5.2 Limitations
5.3 Recommendations
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
攻读硕士学位期间发表学术论文情况
Acknowledgements
本文编号：3889644
【文章页数】：69 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Research Objective and Significance
1.2 Methodology
1.2.1 Research Corpus
1.2.2 Research Instrument
1.2.3 Research Question
1.3 Organization
2 Literature Review
2.1 Previous Studies on Wh-question
2.1.1 Position of Wh-question in Chinese Interrogative System
2.1.2 Previous Studies on Chinese Wh-question
2.2 Previous Studies on Courtroom Discourse
2.2.1 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Structure and Form
2.2.2 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Interaction
2.2.3 Overseas and Domestic Studies on the Power
2.3 Situation of Studies on Chinese Courtroom Discourse in CNKI
3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Theme-Rheme Theory
3.2 Focus Theory
3.2.1 Domestic Viewpoints on the Concept “Focus”
3.2.2 Classifications of the Focus
3.3 The Overall Theoretical Framework
4 Discourse Structures and Informative Function of Wh-question in ChineseCourtroom Discourse
4.1 Basic Information of Criminal Trial Conversations
4.1.1 General Introduction to Chinese Criminal Trials
4.1.2 Roles of Criminal Trial Participants
4.2 Intonation Nucleus
4.3 Classifications and Applications of Discourse Structures of Wh-question inChinese Courtroom Discourse
4.4 Informative Functions of Wh-question in Chinese Courtroom Discourse
4.4.1 Theme + rheme, with the focus on the latter: reconfirm the giveninformation
4.4.2 Null theme, rheme occurs in the sentence-initial position with the focus
4.4.2.1 In-depth inquiry
4.4.2.2 Strengthening the cooperative communication
4.4.2.3 Confirmation and verification
4.4.3 Theme + rheme, with the focus in the first section: express speaker’ssubjective attitude
4.5 Applications of Informative Functions of Wh-question in Chinese CourtroomDiscourse
5 Conclusion
5.1 General Conclusions
5.2 Limitations
5.3 Recommendations
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
攻读硕士学位期间发表学术论文情况
Acknowledgements
本文编号：3889644
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/3889644.html