神话—原型批评视角下的勒克莱齐奥小说

发布时间：2019-07-06 11:57

【摘要】：19世纪是西方理性宣布神话消亡的世纪，20世纪是神话复兴的世纪，众多的现代主义文学大家乔伊斯、艾略特、福克纳等都在文学作品中大量运用神话，神话在后世的延续呈现在文学作品中就是“置换变形”，神话一次次被重述、重构乃至“戏仿”。神话原型批评作为当今最有影响的文学批评理论之一，为文学研究开辟了新的视野。作为一种批评理论，它自觉地借鉴和运用文化人类学视野的产物，在批评实践中，力图发现文学作品中反复出现的各种意象、叙事结构和人物类型，找出它们背后的基本形式，并把一系列原型广泛应用于对作品的分析、阐释和评价，从而开辟了文学研究新的角度和空间。本论文力图以神话原型批评理论为工具和切入点，为法国当代作家勒克莱齐奥小说研究提供一个新的角度。本文的绪论部分就作家作品的国内出版译著、国内外研究现状、论文的研究方法做一简单梳理和说明。论文主体部分为三个部分：勒克莱齐奥小说的神话渊源，神话原型批评视角下的勒克莱齐奥以及勒克莱齐奥小说的神话启示和现代性批判。第一部分以西方文化中的神话回归为研究背景，着力探讨勒克莱齐奥小说中所体现的神话维度和人类学视野，小说中所蕴涵的神话冲击与交融，进而明确勒克莱齐奥发现异域的非西方中心主义视角。第二部分运用神话原型理论，，结合文本分析和比较神话学理论，探讨《奥尼恰》、《沙漠》、《流浪的星星》、《诉讼笔录》等作品中的意象原型、情节原型、人物原型、主题原型。第三部分探寻勒克莱齐奥小说带给人类的神话启示—万物有灵及生命循环观。借助自然和女性作家反思技术进步，通过自身无根化的体验表达作家对身份认同及民族认同的思考。
[Abstract]:The 19th century is the century in which western reason declares the demise of mythology, and the 20th century is the century of mythological renaissance. Many modernist literature Joyce, Eliot, Faulkner and so on make a lot of use of mythology in literary works. The continuation of mythology in later generations is "replacement deformation". Mythology has been restated, reconstructed and even "parody" again and again. Mythological archetypal criticism, as one of the most influential literary criticism theories, has opened up a new field of vision for literary research. As a kind of critical theory, it consciously draws lessons from and applies the product of cultural anthropological vision, tries to find out all kinds of images, narrative structures and character types that appear repeatedly in literary works, finds out the basic forms behind them, and widely applies a series of archetypes to the analysis, interpretation and evaluation of works, thus opening up a new angle and space for literary research. This paper tries to provide a new angle for the study of French contemporary writer Leclezio's novels by using mythological archetypal criticism theory as a tool and starting point. The introduction part of this paper briefly combs and explains the domestic published and translated works, the research status at home and abroad, and the research methods of the paper. The main part of the thesis is divided into three parts: the mythological origin of Leclezio's novels, Leclezio from the perspective of mythological archetypal criticism, and the mythological enlightenment and modern criticism of Leclezio's novels. The first part, based on the mythological return in western culture, focuses on the mythological dimension and anthropological vision embodied in Leclezio's novels, the mythological impact and blending contained in the novels, and then clarifies the non-Western centralism perspective of Leclezio's discovery of foreign regions. The second part uses the mythological archetypal theory, combined with text analysis and comparative mythological theory, to explore the image archetypes, plot archetypes, character archetypes and theme archetypes in Ornicha, Desert, wandering Star, Litigation record and so on. The third part explores the mythological enlightenment of Leclezio's novels to human beings-the concept of spiritual and life cycle of all things. With the help of nature and female writers to reflect on technological progress, through their own rooted experience to express writers' thinking on identity and national identity.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I565.074

【参考文献】