语用学视角下男女非真实性话语使用差异
发布时间：2023-05-14 06:13
非真实性话语(Deception,DEC)的研究已经盛行了几十载,然而大部分研究集中在对狭义范围的DEC(即谎言)的分析,很少有学者深入探究其成因和运行机制,并且将性别作为变量因素纳入研究范围。大多数从事有关非真实性话语性别差异研究的学者仍热衷于发掘男女使用DEC过程中所泄露的语言或非语言的线索或是语言词汇层面的差异。 本文试图从语言语用的宏观层面来分析非真实性话语,借用关联顺应的理论框架来阐释DEC在实际使用过程中的运行方式。首先作者对非真实性话语的界定进行了讨论,阐述了其与谎言以及一些修辞手法的异同。陈述的虚假性并非是非真实性话语的充分必要条件,动机意图才是主要因素。不论是从策略角度还是语言层面看,言语交际都是一个不断选择语言形式的过程。非真实性话语作为一种语用策略为人们所使用,以期达成某种特定的交际目的和效果。从关联顺应的角度看,人们在动态的交际过程中,要对对方的认知语境作出最佳的关联假设,从而使非真实性话语能够顺应交际双方的背景语境最终实现某种交际效果。 本文通过问卷调查的研究方式,在问卷中设置了由不同动机为导向的场景,涉及不同亲疏关系的目标对象,旨在分析男女非真实性话语策略使...
【文章页数】：89 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
摘要
ABSTRACT
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter One INTRODUCTION
1.1 Pervasiveness of Deception
1.2 Research orientation and significance
1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two LITERAUTRE REVIEW
2.1 Definition of Deception
2.1.1 Working definition of DEC
2.1.2 DEC and lying
2.1.3 DEC and some rhetoric devices
2.2 Different approaches towards Deception
2.2.1 The study from ethnic and philosophical field
2.2.2 The study from psychological field
2.2.3 The study from sociological approach
2.2.4 The study from linguistic approach
2.2.5 Major problems existing in past studies of DEC
2.3 Studies of DEC between Different Genders
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 Conceptualizing Deception
3.1.1 Forms of DEC
3.1.2 Intensions and Motives of DEC
3.2 Major Theoretical Models Conceptualizing Deception
3.2.1 Information Manipulation Theory
3.2.2 Interpersonal Deception Theory
3.2.3 Problems existing in the above Theoretical Models
3.3 DEC from the pragmatic perspective : Relevance and Adaptation Model
3.3.1 Deception as a result of linguistic choice-making
3.3.2 Deception as a Dynamic communicative interact
3.3.3 Deception as a result of Relevance and adaptation
Chapter Four METHOD
4.1 Overview
4.2 Research method
4.2.1 Description of participants
4.2.2 Summary of research hypothesis
4.2.3 Description and criteria of questionnaire
Chapter Five RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
5.1 Gender differences on cognition of DEC prototype
5.2 Motives of deception between the two genders
5.3 Deceptive strategies and shame levels between the two genders
5.3.1 Other-oriented DEC
5.3.2 Self-oriented DEC
5.3.3 DEC for fun
5.4 Acceptability of DEC between the two genders
5.5 Summary
5.6 Possible causes
5.6.1 Physical and social world
5.6.2 Mental world
Chapter Six CONCLUSION
6.1 Major finding in the present study
6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further research
REFERENCES
Appendix Questionnaire
附录：作者在攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文
本文编号：3817346
【文章页数】：89 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
摘要
ABSTRACT
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter One INTRODUCTION
1.1 Pervasiveness of Deception
1.2 Research orientation and significance
1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two LITERAUTRE REVIEW
2.1 Definition of Deception
2.1.1 Working definition of DEC
2.1.2 DEC and lying
2.1.3 DEC and some rhetoric devices
2.2 Different approaches towards Deception
2.2.1 The study from ethnic and philosophical field
2.2.2 The study from psychological field
2.2.3 The study from sociological approach
2.2.4 The study from linguistic approach
2.2.5 Major problems existing in past studies of DEC
2.3 Studies of DEC between Different Genders
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 Conceptualizing Deception
3.1.1 Forms of DEC
3.1.2 Intensions and Motives of DEC
3.2 Major Theoretical Models Conceptualizing Deception
3.2.1 Information Manipulation Theory
3.2.2 Interpersonal Deception Theory
3.2.3 Problems existing in the above Theoretical Models
3.3 DEC from the pragmatic perspective : Relevance and Adaptation Model
3.3.1 Deception as a result of linguistic choice-making
3.3.2 Deception as a Dynamic communicative interact
3.3.3 Deception as a result of Relevance and adaptation
Chapter Four METHOD
4.1 Overview
4.2 Research method
4.2.1 Description of participants
4.2.2 Summary of research hypothesis
4.2.3 Description and criteria of questionnaire
Chapter Five RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
5.1 Gender differences on cognition of DEC prototype
5.2 Motives of deception between the two genders
5.3 Deceptive strategies and shame levels between the two genders
5.3.1 Other-oriented DEC
5.3.2 Self-oriented DEC
5.3.3 DEC for fun
5.4 Acceptability of DEC between the two genders
5.5 Summary
5.6 Possible causes
5.6.1 Physical and social world
5.6.2 Mental world
Chapter Six CONCLUSION
6.1 Major finding in the present study
6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further research
REFERENCES
Appendix Questionnaire
附录：作者在攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文
本文编号：3817346
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/3817346.html