汉语因果连词和条件连词对句子加工影响的ERPs研究

发布时间：2023-06-10 14:42

　　连词在句子识解和连贯语篇构建方面有着很重要的作用。近年来,很多学者对表达因果、条件、让步等关系的连词或复句进行过研究。从理论研究的角度看,学者们从认知语言学、语用学、句法和语义的角度对因果复句和条件复句进行过梳理。从实证研究的角度看,许多学者通过眼动和事件相关电位技术研究过因果复句、条件复句以及因果连词与让步连词对句子理解的差异对比。有学者发现:当被试阅读复句时,被试默认推断句子间的关系为因果关系,并提出“条件关系是因果关系的次范畴”,这些为因果复句和条件复句的分类和运用,以及两者的对比积累了成果。前人的研究为因果复句和条件复句的实证研究打下了基础,但还没有学者从实证研究的角度研究过汉语因果连词和条件连词对复句理解加工的影响。本文借助事件相关电位(ERPs),考察连词对不同类型复句的影响。本文的研究目的在于探讨因果连词“因为......所以......”和条件连词“如果......那么......”分别在逻辑因果复句和逻辑条件复句的加工过程中的脑机制及反应时差异,以此来验证Millis&Just在1994年提出的“the Connective Integration Model...

【文章页数】：97 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Objective
    1.3 Methodology
    1.4 Significance of the Present Study
    1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Causals and Conditionals Revisited
        2.2.1 Definition of Causals and Conditionals
            2.2.1.1 Definition of Causals
            2.2.1.2 Definition of Conditionals
        2.2.2 Classification of Causals and Conditionals
            2.2.2.1 Classification of Causals
            2.2.2.2 Classification of Conditionals
    2.3 ERPs and Language Research
        2.3.1 An Introduction of ERPs Technique
        2.3.2 Application of ERPs Technique to Language Research
        2.3.3 Major Component Related to the Present Study
    2.4 Previous Studies on Causals and Conditionals
        2.4.1 Theoretical Studies on Causals and Conditionals
            2.4.1.1 Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Causals
            2.4.1.2 Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Conditionals
            2.4.1.3 Summary
        2.4.2 Neuro-Cognitive Approach to Causals and Conditionals
            2.4.2.1 Eye Tracking Studies
            2.4.2.2 ERPs Studies
            2.4.2.3 Summary
        2.4.3 Comments on Previous Studies
    2.5 Previous Studies on Connectives
        2.5.1 Theoretical Framework of the Connective Integration     Model
        2.5.2 Previous Studies on Connectives
        2.5.3 Comments on Previous Studies to Connectives
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research Question
    3.2 Research Design
    3.3 Method
        3.3.1 Participants
        3.3.2 Materials
        3.3.3 Instruments
        3.3.4 Procedures
    3.4 Data Collection
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Behavioral Results
    4.2 ERPs Results
        4.2.1 Comparison of Differences in Construal Processing Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives
            4.2.1.1 1000ms-2200ms
            4.2.1.2 2200ms-3200ms
        4.2.2 Comparison of Processing Logical Causals and Logical     Conditionals with and without Connectives in Brain Area
            4.2.2.1 1000ms-2200ms
            4.2.2.2 2200ms-3200ms
            4.2.2.3 Summary
    4.3 Discussion
        4.3.1 Discussion on Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals in Rating and Response Time Results
            4.3.1.1 Differences in Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives on Rating Results
            4.3.1.2 Differences in Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives on Response Time Results
        4.3.2 Discussion on Processing Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals in Brain Areas
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Studies
References
Appendix 1 The Profile of Subject
Appendix 2 Instruction and Materials



本文编号：3833048