中国法庭话语的言语行为分析

发布时间：2021-08-17 06:16

　　法庭话语作为法律语言学研究的一个重要方面,近年来引起学界愈来愈多的关注。法庭审判活动是法庭话语的体现,它是通过一系列言语行为来进行的。法庭审判作为最重要的法律实践活动,其过程涉及到是否能体现程序公正,司法公正的问题;其结果关系到当事人的财产得失、被告人权利的剥夺、定罪量刑的轻重等切身利益。因此法庭言语行为研究具有重要的理论和实践意义。该研究是以Austin和Searle的言语行为理论为基础和理论框架,结合话语分析的方法,并根据案例语料,从语用学角度对中国法庭话语的言语行为来进行分析。目前,虽然国内对法律语言学的研究很关注,但主要集中在对法律语言的词汇、句法和翻译方面,而对法庭话语及其言语行为研究却很少涉及。本文旨在运用语用学的言语行为理论来阐述法庭言语行为的规则、特点和方式、以及具体分析法庭审判中的主要参与者——法律工作者的言语行为。该研究不仅有利于我们对法庭言语行为有更深刻的理解,而且为规范法律语言、完善司法制度、体现程序公正、司法公正提供了新的视角。本文首先对Austin和Searle的言语行为理论和国内外对法庭话语的研究进行介绍,然后运用言语行为理论来论述法庭话语中的言语行为构成... 

【文章来源】：西南政法大学重庆市

【文章页数】：83 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Rationale for the Study
    1.2 Statement of Problems
    1.3 Purpose of the Study
    1.4 Significance of the Study
    1.5 Scope and Limitation of the Study
    1.6 Organization of This Thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Overview on Speech Act Theory
        2.1.1 Austin’s Speech Act Theory
            2.1.1.1 Performatives and Constatives
            2.1.1.2 Felicity Conditions on Performatives
            2.1.1.3 Tripartite Acts in a Speech Act
            2.1.1.4 Austin’s classification of illocutionary acts
        2.1.2 Searle’s Development of Speech Act Theory
            2.1.2.1 Searle’s Classification of Speech Acts
            2.1.2.2 Searle’s Rules of Speech Acts
            2.1.2.3 Searle’s Felicity Conditions on Illocutionary Acts
    2.2 Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.1 Definition of Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.2 Characteristics of Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.3 A Brief Introduction to the Studies on Courtroom Discourse
            2.2.3.1 Studies on Courtroom Discourse Abroad
            2.2.3.2 Studies on courtroom discourse at home
        2.2.4 Studies on Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
CHAPTER THREE APPLICATION OF SPEECH ACT THEORY TCOURTROOM DISCOURSE
    3.1 Constitutive Rules of Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.1.1 Rule of Jurisprudence
        3.1.2 Rule of the Right to Speak
        3.1.3 Rule of Procedures
        3.1.4 Rule of Evidence
        3.1.5 Rule of Debate
    3.2 Felicity Conditions of the Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.2.1 Asymmetry of the Right to Speak
        3.2.2 Legal Procedures of Courtroom Discourse
        3.2.3 Necessity of Interactive Debate in Court
    3.3 Classification of the Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.3.1 Representatives
        3.3.2 Directives
        3.3.3 Commissives
        3.3.4 Expressives
        3.3.5 Declarations
CAPTER FOUR ANALYSIS OF THE SPEECH ACTS IN CHINESE COURTROOM DISCOURSE
    4.1 Analysis of Courtroom Participants’Speech Acts
        4.1.1 Analysis of Judges’Speech Acts
        4.1.2 Analysis of Public Prosecutors’Speech Acts
        4.1.3 Analysis of Lawyers’Speech Acts
    4.2 Means of the Speech Acts performed in Courtroom Discourse
        4.2.1 Question-Answer
        4.2.2 Statement
        4.2.3 Debate
        4.2.4 Direction
        4.2.5 Declaration
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Summary
    5.2 Some Implications
    5.3 Suggestions for further research
Bibliography



本文编号：3347233