表现民俗的理解及其功能分析

发布时间：2018-06-21 04:54

本文选题：表现民俗 + 民俗文化　；参考：《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年03期

【摘要】：民俗村或民族村民俗再造及民俗旅游中的民俗风情展示问题一直是学界探讨的对象,或认为它是伪民俗,对民俗文化有负面影响;或认为是表演的民俗,有虚拟和夸大的成分;或认为民族村的民俗再造等是民俗的"被表现",如果再造得当就能成为一种可接受的民俗。表现民俗有广义和狭义之分。从民俗流变的角度,将广义上的表现民俗区别为生活民俗、表现民俗、表演民俗和伪民俗,认为生活民俗是民俗传承的本真、常态形式,表现民俗是民俗传承的新常态形式,表演民俗是民俗文化多样性的展示形式,伪民俗是一种社会文化乱象;狭义表现民俗是指对本真地民俗进行相对客观的"时空再造"。
[Abstract]:The issue of folk customs and customs in folklore villages or ethnic villages and folklore tourism has always been discussed by academic circles, or it is considered to be false folklore, which has a negative influence on folk culture, or that it is the folk custom of performance, which has fictitious and exaggerated elements. Or think that the folk custom remaking of the national village is the "expression" of the folk custom, and if it is properly reconstituted, it can become an acceptable folklore. There are broad and narrow ways to express folklore. From the point of view of the change of folklore, this paper distinguishes the performance folklore in a broad sense as life folklore, performance folklore and pseudo-folklore, and holds that life folklore is the true, normal form of folklore inheritance, and performance folklore is the new normal form of folklore inheritance. Performance folklore is the display form of the diversity of folk culture, pseudo-folklore is a kind of social cultural disorder, and the narrow expression of folklore refers to the relatively objective "time and space reconstruction" of the native folklore.
【作者单位】：武汉大学社会学系;
【基金】：2015年国家文化创新工程重点项目——“村落民俗文化传承模式创新实践”
【分类号】：K890

【相似文献】