比较文化视域下的东亚水意象

发布时间：2018-05-12 09:48

  本文选题：东亚自然观 + 文化比较　； 参考：《浙江大学》2016年博士论文

【摘要】：日渐发达的物质文明和不断升级的生态危机是一个物体的两面,它带来了人们对西方文化、西方分析思维的反思以及东方"天人合一"自然观的水涨船高。"天人合一"自然观作为一种哲学思想源于中国,同时它作为一种自然智慧,又是处于同一汉字文化圈的人们,在各自的自然环境、人文环境下的生存体验历史。西方危机带来的人与自然的思考,是人与生存环境、人与文化传统的思考,它应该是直接的、具象的、多元化的。因此本文通过水这一与人们的生存、生活、审美实践密切相关的自然元素,从比较文化视角对东亚中日韩水意象进行比较,以求能够重塑东亚"天人合一"自然观的传统生命意识。就东亚内部的文化比较而言差异性重于共性,差异性其根源是文化的内在自生性。然而由于东西比较范式的影响,"东亚"很容易被简单划入以中国为代表的文化范畴,从而忽略了日韩文化的内在特质。基于这一点,本文提出以差异性为基础探讨东亚自然观的文化传统,并试图构建新的东亚水原型意象比较模式。为此,首先从三国自然环境、文化背景、思维方式、原始宗教信仰出发,考察了中日韩"天人合一"自然观,发现了其不同特点。即中国强调主客体统一的天人合一自然观,注重向天的自然媒介作用;日本从万物源于"心"的宇宙观出发,强调神人"和"与本性;韩国的"天人相舆"自然观则注重人的主体实践对自然(天)产生的积极作用。其次,追溯到中日韩文化中的水思想源头,论述了中日韩水思想与文化背景的内在联系,以此构筑了中日韩水意象比较的内在理论体系。在东亚水原型意象比较上,本文通过神话、民俗文化、文学等三种诠释方式,考察了水在中日韩各自的生存环境、生活环境、审美实践中的文化意象。从共性来看,东亚水原型意象都具有生命意义、女性意义、时空意义,而差异性在于各自水生命意义的不同内涵,以及由此产生的三个文化意象之间的内在关联。中国水原型意象追求来自生命源头的永恒性;日本文化的水原型意象体现生命更新意识,通过灵魂的净化获取无限的能量;韩国水原型生命意义体现两性结合原理,强调生命形态的完整性,这是用人的生命形态观照自然的结果。这些差异性是东亚文化圈的人们对自身生命活动进行根本性思考的结果,并且在漫长的历史中逐渐内化为一定文化群体的水精神。
[Abstract]:The increasingly developed material civilization and the escalating ecological crisis are two sides of the same object, which brings people's reflection on the western culture, Western analytical thinking and the rising tide of the oriental view of "the unity of nature and man". " As a philosophical thought, the concept of nature originates from China, at the same time, as a kind of natural wisdom, it is also a kind of people in the same cultural circle of Chinese characters, living and experiencing history in their own natural environment and humanistic environment. The thinking of man and nature brought by the western crisis is the thinking of man and living environment, man and cultural tradition. It should be direct, concrete and pluralistic. Therefore, through water, a natural element closely related to people's survival, life and aesthetic practice, this paper compares the water images of East Asia, China, Japan and South Korea from the perspective of comparative culture. In order to reshape the traditional life consciousness of East Asia's "the unity of nature and man". In terms of the cultural comparison in East Asia, the difference is more important than the commonness, and the root of the difference is the inherent spontaneity of the culture. However, due to the influence of the East-West comparative paradigm, "East Asia" is easily classified into the category of culture represented by China, thus neglecting the inherent characteristics of Japanese and Korean culture. Based on this, this paper proposes to explore the cultural tradition of East Asia's view of nature on the basis of difference, and tries to construct a new model of East Asian water archetypal image comparison. Therefore, starting from the natural environment, cultural background, mode of thinking and primitive religious belief of the three countries, this paper investigates the natural view of "the unity of nature and man" between China, Japan and South Korea, and finds its different characteristics. That is, China emphasizes the unity of the subject and the object, the unity of nature and man, and the role of the natural medium to the sky, and Japan emphasizes the nature of God and man from the view of the universe in which all things originate from the heart. In Korea, the view of nature emphasizes the positive effect of man's main body practice on nature. Secondly, it traces back to the source of water thought in the culture of China, Japan and Korea, and discusses the internal relation between the water thought of China, Japan and Korea and the cultural background, and constructs the internal theoretical system of water image comparison between China, Japan and Korea. In the comparison of East Asian water archetypal images, this paper examines the living environment, living environment and aesthetic practice of water in China, Japan and South Korea by means of mythology, folklore culture and literature. From the general point of view, the East Asian water archetypal images all have the meaning of life, the meaning of women, the meaning of time and space, and the difference lies in the different connotations of their own water life meanings, and the internal relations among the three cultural images. The Chinese water archetypal image pursues the permanence from the source of life; the water archetypal image of Japanese culture embodies the consciousness of life renewal and obtains unlimited energy through the purification of soul; the Korean water archetypal life meaning embodies the principle of the combination of two sexes. Emphasize the integrity of life form, this is the result of human life form view of nature. These differences are the result of people in East Asian cultural circle thinking about their own life activities, and gradually internalize the water spirit of a certain cultural group in the long history.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：I106;G04
，

本文编号：1878120