写前讨论任务对写作流利性的影响研究

发布时间：2024-03-08 01:04

　　“写前讨论”指教师在写作前组织学生分成小组,引导学生对于某一作文主题进行讨论,为学生增加理解的机会并迅速地在规定的时间内完成写作。然而,关于它的研究集中在对写作质量的影响,且大多定位在大学生和英语专业等高级英语学习者。特别是对写作流利度的影响更是无人探索。因此为了弥补这一缺口,本研究的重点在于考察“预写讨论”在高中阶段对写作流利度影响。本研究采用实验的方式来研究“写前讨论”对流利度的影响。本研究的被试对象为89名来自湖南某普通高一两个班的学生,他们随机分成实验班和控制班。写作教学实验前,学生被要求写一篇文章。试验期间,学生每两周进行一次写作训练,其中实验班采取“写前讨论”教学模式,而控制班则采用传统写作教学模式。实验后,两个班的学生再次要求写一篇文章作为后测。为了进一步检测他们对“预写讨论”是否提高流利度的看法,本研究还采用了预写讨论问卷(Cronbach’s a=0.673)。此外,为了弥补问卷调查的不足,增加本次研究的信度,本研究还提供了4名来自不同自写作水平的学生的访谈,以期待活动更好效果。本研究主义有以下发现:第一,实验班和控制班经过两个月的训练后,在作文流利度方面存在显著差异...

【文章页数】：73 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Abbreviations
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 The structure of the thesis
Chapter2 Literature Review
    2.1 Overview of Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.1 Definition of Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.2 Theoretical Foundation for Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.3 Previous Studies of Prewriting Discussion
    2.2 Overview of Writing Fluency
        2.2.1 Definition of Writing Fluency
        2.2.2 The Measurement Indexes of Writing Fluency
        2.2.3 Previous Studies of Writing Fluency Abroad
        2.2.4 Previous Studies of Prewriting Discussion at Home
    2.3 Summary
Chapter3 Research Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Research Subjects
    3.3 Instruments
        3.3.1 English Writing Test
        3.3.2 Questionnaire
        3.3.3 Follow-up Interview
    3.4 Research Procedures
        3.4.1 Pre-experiment
        3.4.2 During-experiment
        3.4.3 Topics and Genre of Compositions
        3.4.4 The teaching method in the experiment class
        3.4.5 The teaching method in the control class
        3.4.6 Post-experiment
    3.5 Data Collection and Data Analysis
        3.5.1 Data Collection
        3.5.2 The Measurement of Writing Fluency
        3.5.3 Data Analysis
Character4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results of the Two Classes’Writing fluency
        4.1.1 Results of Two Classes’Writing Fluency in Pre-test
        4.1.2 Results of Two Classes’Writing Fluency in Post-test
    4.2.Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency
        4.2.1 Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency in Pretest
        4.2.2 Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency in Post-test
    4.3.Results of Questionnaire in Post-test
    4.4 Feedback from the Follow-up Interview
    4.5 Discussion of the Results
        4.5.1 Discussion of the First question
        4.5.2 Discussion of the Second Question
        4.5.3 Discussion of Questionnaire and Interview
Chapter5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Pedagogic Implications
    5.3 Limitations
    5.4 Suggestions for the Further Research
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ
Appendix Ⅳ
Acknowledgements
在读期间公开发表论文(著作)及科研情况



本文编号：3921770