探析理想化认知模型的矛盾性

发布时间：2023-06-08 20:23

　　理想化认知模型(ICM)是第二代认知语言学家Lakoff在1982年和1987年基于体验哲学和原型范畴等理论提出的,含命题结构、意象图式、隐喻映射和转喻映射四种原则,以此解释概念结构、语义范畴和范畴化。以往的学者认为ICM仅限于原型范畴的讨论,但我们通过研究发现三大问题:首先, ICM四大原则之一的“命题原则”,具有客观性,并带有第一代认知科学的部分特征,可以将其追溯到以客观主义为基础的第一代认知科学理论框架下。其次,ICM的提出是为了解决原型范畴的层级性问题,ICM相对于认知模型(CM)具有层级性,但又不能脱离其带有线性特征的原型范畴理论基础。再次,ICM跟CM的关系不自洽,一方面ICM具有CM的普遍性特征,另一方面,ICM又是基于CM间家族相似度的差异性相加。因此本文最后作出如下结论:ICM虽然源于原型范畴理论,但也包含经典范畴的某些特征;其理论可追溯至经典逻辑;其理论建构具有不自洽性。 认知语言学主要围绕ICM的非客观性、心智层级和ICM的原型范畴特征提出了各自的观点,但是没有论述并对比ICM的主观层级体系和客观层级(即经典范畴层级体系)的关联,并将ICM中的客观性追溯到经典范畴...

【文章页数】：70 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale for the Study
    1.2 Objectives
    1.3 Methodology
    1.4 Layout
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Hierarchy of ICM
        2.2.1 Review of CM
        2.2.2 Previous Studies on ICM
        2.2.3 Preview of Levels of Conceptual Domains
        2.2.4 In What Sense Is ICM Hierarchical
    2.3 Non-objectivism of Propositional ICMs
        2.3.1 Preview of Propositional ICMs
        2.3.2 Logic Background of ICMs
        2.3.3 Previous Studies on Non-objectivism
        2.3.4 In What Sense Is ICM Non-objective
    2.4 Category Study of ICMs
        2.4.1.C ategory Study of ICMs within the Prototypical Approach
        2.4.2 Category Study of ICMs within the Classical Approach
        2.4.3 Contrasts between Classical Theory and Prototype Theory
    2.5 Gaps
Chapter Three Rethinking ICMs
    3.1 The Role of ICM in Cognitive Linguistics
        3.1.1 The Merits of ICMs
        3.1.2 The Limits of ICMs
    3.2 Philosophic Background of ICMs
    3.3 Contradictions of ICM Theory
Chapter Four Contradictions of ICMs
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Locating ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Hierarchy and Linearity
        4.2.1 Locating Family Resemblance as Linearity
        4.2.2 Locating ICM as Linearity
        4.2.3 Summary
    4.3 Locating Propositional ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Objectivity and Non-objectivity
        4.3.1 Locating Propositional ICM as Formal Logic
            4.3.1.1 Locating Propositional ICM as Intensional Logic
            4.3.1.2 Locating Intensional Logic as Formal Logic
            4.3.1.3 Locating Propositional ICM as Formal Logic
        4.3.2 Locating Propositional ICM as Objective
        4.3.3 Summary
    4.4 Summarizing ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Logic and Perception, Essence and Phenomenon
        4.4.1 Prototype Effects and Classical Features in ICMs
        4.4.2 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Studies
References



本文编号：3832429