材料数量和人格特质对学习判断的影响研究

发布时间：2018-01-26 05:18

本文关键词： 学习判断学习判断的绝对准确性材料数量人格特质　出处：《东北师范大学》2016年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：学习判断是个体对当前学习项目回忆成绩的一种预见性判断。学习判断是元记忆监测的一种,它对个体监测自己的学习过程起着非常重要的作用,学习判断监测的准确性有利于提高学习者知识和技能的学习效率。学习判断的等级和学习判断的准确性是学习判断研究的主要指标。在学习判断的研究中,大多集中在学习判断的影响因素上。本研究以材料数量和人格特质为自变量从任务变量和个体变量两方面探讨两者共同对学习判断等级及其绝对准确性的影响。本研究首先综述了学习判断、人格特质、学习判断与人格特质三个领域相关的理论和实证研究,通过问卷调查法和实验法等考察了材料数量和人格特质对学习判断的影响状况。根据学习判断发生的时间不同,本研究分为两大部分。第一部分探讨材料数量和人格特质对即时学习判断的影响。第二部分探讨材料数量和人格特质对延迟学习判断的影响。每部分研究又分为三个实验,分别探讨了内外倾、神经质及由内外倾和神经质组合的混和人格和材料数量对学习判断的影响状况。两部分的研究都是以学习判断的等级、判断偏差、绝对准确性为研究指标,分别考察了逐项学习判断和总项学习判断两种判断类型。通过对上述研究结果的分析和讨论,得出以下结论：1.材料数量和人格特质共同影响个体的学习判断及其绝对准确性。2.在不同的材料数量和判断类型条件下,不同人格特质对个体学习判断及其绝对确性会产生不同的影响。3.在不同人格特质和判断类型条件下,识记材料的数量对个体学习判断及其绝对准确性会产生不同的影响。4.不同人格特质个体在逐项判断条件下,表现出延迟效应；在总项判断条件下,没有表现出延迟效应。5.不同人格特质个体在即时和延迟两种判断条件下,其总项判断等级均低于逐项判断,表现为总项判断的绝对准确性好于逐项判断。
[Abstract]:Learning judgment is a kind of predictive judgment of individual's recall achievement of current learning items. Learning judgment is a kind of metamemory monitoring, which plays a very important role in individual monitoring of their own learning process. The accuracy of learning judgment monitoring is helpful to improve the learning efficiency of learners' knowledge and skills. The grade of learning judgment and the accuracy of learning judgment are the main indicators of learning judgment research. This study focuses on the influencing factors of learning judgment. This study takes the quantity of materials and personality traits as independent variables to explore the influence of both task variables and individual variables on the learning judgment level and its absolute accuracy. This study first summarizes learning judgment. A theoretical and empirical study of personality traits, learning judgments and personality traits. The effects of material quantity and personality traits on learning judgment were investigated by means of questionnaire and experiment. This study is divided into two parts. The first part discusses the effect of material quantity and personality trait on instant learning judgment. The second part discusses the effect of material quantity and personality trait on delayed learning judgment. Three experiments. The effects of introversion, introversion, neuroticism and the combination of introversion and introversion and neuroticism on learning judgment were discussed. The absolute accuracy is used as the research index, the two types of judgment, item by item learning judgment and total item learning judgment, are investigated respectively. The results of the above research are analyzed and discussed. Draw the following conclusion: 1. Material quantity and personality traits affect individual learning judgment and its absolute accuracy. 2. Under different material quantity and judgment type conditions. Different personality traits have different effects on individual learning judgment and its absolute accuracy. 3. Under different personality traits and judgment types. The quantity of memorizing material will have different influence on individual learning judgment and its absolute accuracy. 4. Under the condition of judging item by item, individuals with different personality traits show delay effect; Under the condition of total item judgment, there is no delay effect. 5. Under the two kinds of judgment conditions, the total item judgment level of individuals with different personality traits is lower than that of item by item judgment. The absolute accuracy of total judgment is better than that of item by item.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：B842.3

【相似文献】